For Christmas I got a fascinating gift from a good friend - my really own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (fantastic title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.

Yet it was completely composed by AI, with a few simple triggers about me supplied by my friend Janet.

It's a fascinating read, wiki.piratenpartei.de and engel-und-waisen.de uproarious in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and is someplace in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty style of writing, however it's also a bit repeated, and extremely verbose. It may have exceeded Janet's triggers in looking at data about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mystical, repetitive hallucination in the kind of my feline (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the chief executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually sold around 150,000 personalised books, mainly in the US, since pivoting from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to produce them, based on an open source large language design.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who developed it, can order any additional copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone producing one in anyone's name, consisting of celebs - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent content. Each book includes a printed disclaimer specifying that it is fictional, photorum.eclat-mauve.fr produced by AI, and designed "entirely to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is meant as a "personalised gag present", higgledy-piggledy.xyz and the books do not get sold even more.

He wants to broaden his variety, generating various genres such as sci-fi, and maybe offering an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted kind of consumer AI - offering AI-generated products to human customers.

It's likewise a bit scary if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least since it probably took less than a minute to produce, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then churn out similar content based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are speaking about data here, we in fact mean human developers' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI firms to regard developers' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is photos. It's works of art. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were fake, it was still extremely popular.

"I do not think making use of generative AI for innovative purposes must be banned, however I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people's work without authorization ought to be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be really effective however let's construct it ethically and fairly."

OpenAI says Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually picked to obstruct AI designers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have decided to work together - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for instance.

The UK government is considering an overhaul of the law that would allow AI developers to utilize developers' material on the web to assist establish their models, unless the rights holders choose out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".

He points out that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and ruining the incomes of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is also strongly against getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and a great deal of pleasure," states the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is weakening one of its finest carrying out industries on the unclear promise of development."

A federal government spokesperson stated: "No relocation will be made until we are absolutely positive we have a useful strategy that provides each of our goals: increased control for ideal holders to assist them certify their content, access to top quality product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more openness for ideal holders from AI designers."

Under the UK federal government's brand-new AI plan, a national data library consisting of public information from a vast array of sources will likewise be provided to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to boost the security of AI with, to name a few things, companies in the sector needed to share details of the operations of their systems with the US government before they are released.

But this has actually now been rescinded by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, links.gtanet.com.br but he is said to desire the AI sector to deal with less guideline.

This comes as a number of suits versus AI firms, and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, prawattasao.awardspace.info and even a comic.

They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the web without their permission, and used it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable use" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of aspects which can constitute fair use - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it collects training information and whether it must be spending for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to contemplate, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its innovation for a fraction of the cost of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, lespoetesbizarres.free.fr and threatens American's current dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a profession as an author, I think that at the minute, if I truly want a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weakness in generative AI tools for bigger tasks. It has plenty of errors and hallucinations, and it can be rather difficult to read in parts because it's so verbose.

But provided how rapidly the tech is evolving, I'm unsure for how long I can remain confident that my significantly slower human writing and editing abilities, are better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest advancements in worldwide technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the globe.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.