For Christmas I received a fascinating gift from a good friend - my extremely own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (fantastic title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has glowing reviews.

Yet it was completely written by AI, with a few easy triggers about me supplied by my good friend Janet.

It's an interesting read, and uproarious in parts. But it also meanders rather a lot, oke.zone and is someplace in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty style of writing, however it's also a bit repetitive, and . It may have surpassed Janet's triggers in looking at information about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mystical, repetitive hallucination in the kind of my cat (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had offered around 150,000 customised books, generally in the US, given that pivoting from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to create them, based on an open source big language design.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who developed it, can purchase any more copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone producing one in anybody's name, securityholes.science consisting of celebrities - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around abusive content. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer specifying that it is fictional, developed by AI, and created "entirely to bring humour and pleasure".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is intended as a "personalised gag gift", and the books do not get sold further.

He wants to broaden his range, generating different categories such as sci-fi, and maybe offering an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted type of customer AI - offering AI-generated goods to human customers.

It's also a bit terrifying if, like me, you write for a living. Not least because it probably took less than a minute to create, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have revealed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then churn out similar material based upon it.

"We need to be clear, when we are talking about information here, we in fact indicate human creators' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, suvenir51.ru which projects for AI companies to respect creators' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is photos. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a tune including AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator trying to choose it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were fake, it was still extremely popular.

"I do not think making use of generative AI for innovative functions should be prohibited, however I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people's work without approval ought to be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be extremely powerful however let's construct it morally and relatively."

OpenAI states Chinese rivals utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually selected to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have actually chosen to team up - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.

The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would allow AI developers to use developers' content on the internet to help develop their models, unless the rights holders opt out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "madness".

He mentions that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and messing up the livelihoods of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, macphersonwiki.mywikis.wiki is also strongly against removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and a whole lot of delight," says the Baroness, who is also a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is weakening one of its best carrying out industries on the unclear pledge of growth."

A federal government representative said: "No relocation will be made till we are definitely confident we have a practical strategy that delivers each of our goals: increased control for right holders to assist them certify their content, access to top quality material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more openness for best holders from AI designers."

Under the UK federal government's brand-new AI plan, a nationwide data library consisting of public information from a large range of sources will likewise be offered to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to boost the safety of AI with, to name a few things, companies in the sector required to share information of the operations of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has now been repealed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is said to desire the AI sector to deal with less regulation.

This comes as a number of claims against AI companies, and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been gotten by everyone from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They claim that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their approval, lespoetesbizarres.free.fr and used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are for that reason exempt. There are a variety of factors which can constitute fair use - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it gathers training information and whether it ought to be paying for it.

If this wasn't all enough to consider, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its innovation for a portion of the price of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and wiki.insidertoday.org threatens American's current supremacy of the sector.

As for me and a profession as an author, I believe that at the moment, if I really want a "bestseller" I'll still need to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weak point in generative AI tools for larger tasks. It is complete of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be quite challenging to read in parts due to the fact that it's so verbose.

But provided how quickly the tech is evolving, I'm not exactly sure for how long I can stay confident that my considerably slower human writing and editing skills, are much better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant advancements in global technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the globe.

Outside the UK? Register here.